Project Cybercrime@EAP II Improving international cooperation on cybercrime in the Eastern Partnership region Meeting under the CyberCrime@EAP II project organised by the Council of Europe 9-11 September 2015, Hotel Novotel, Bucharest, Romania

                                                     About Cybercrime@EAP

Alexander Seger Council of Europe

The approach of the Council of Europe

1 Common standards: Budapest Convention on Cybercrime and relates standards

2 Follow up and assessments: Cybercrime Convention Committee (T-CY)

3 Capacity building: C-PROC
Technical cooperation programmes

Cybercrime@EAP II: Context

Project Cybercrime@EAP II: International cooperation

Note:
Cybercrime@EAPI(2011

2014)
Cybercrime@EAP III (2016

2017)?

Threat of cybercrime and challenge of electronic evidence

Cybercrime Convention Committee, T-CY

  •  Assessment and recommendations on MLA (Dec 2014)
  •  Transborder group (2012- 2014)
  •  Cloud Evidence Group (underway

Cybercrime@EAP II: Summary

Project title:

Cybercrime@EAP II (PMM number 3312)

Project area:

Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine

Duration:

30 months (1 May 2015 30 October 2017)

Budget:

EURO 800,000

Funding:

European Union and Council of Europe Programmatic Cooperation Framework for Eastern Partnership countries

Implementation:

Cybercrime Programme Office (C-PROC) of the Council of Europe

Cybercrime@EAP II: Core issues to be addressed

The level of international co-operation on cybercrime and electronic evidence is limited and very few requests for mutual legal assistance related to electronic evidence are sent or received because of:

  •  Complex and time-consuming procedures for mutual legal assistance;
  •  Absence of mechanisms for expedited mutual legal assistance in the sense of Article 31 of the Budapest Convention;
  •  Limited role of 24/7 points of contact;
  •  Delays in replies and often no replies from foreign countries to

    requests for police and judicial cooperation;

  •  Limited cooperation with multi-national service providers;
  •  Limited trust in cooperation with and between the six EaP

    countries.

Cybercrime@EAP II: Project objective

To enable efficient regional and international co- operation on cybercrime and electronic evidence.

Outcome indicators:

  •  The number of mutual legal assistance requests on cybercrime and electronic evidence sent/received will have increased in the six countries by month 30
  •  The number of requests sent/received by 24/7 points of contact will have increased in the six countries by month 30
  •  Draft amendments to procedures and rules on mutual legal assistance on cybercrime and electronic evidence are available by month 24 in the six countries

Cybercrime@EAP II: Expected results

  1. The authorities responsible for mutual legal assistance in the six EAP countries will have better skills and tools (manual, online resources) for international co-operation on cybercrime and electronic evidence.
  2. The role of 24/7 points of contact will have been strengthened in the six EaP countries.
  3. Recommendations for amendments to procedures and rules on mutual legal assistance on cybercrime and electronic evidence are available for the six EaP countries.

Cybercrime@EAP II: Current status

  •  6 x 2 working groups on MLA and on 24/7 contact points established.
  •  Detailed replies to a questionnaire on international cooperation received.
  •  Partners mobilised: Estonia, France, Germany, Romania and European Cybercrime Centre/EUROPOL.
  •  Initial workplan agreed:
    Meeting 1: Bucharest 9-11 September 2015 Meeting 2: Georgia/TBC, December 2015
    Meeting 3: TBC, March 2016
  •  April 2016 October 2017: support to implementation of recommendations

Cybercrime@EAP II: Meeting Bucharest, 9-11 Sep 2015

Objectives of the meeting:

1. To analyse the procedures and institutional capacities
for Mutual legal assistance on cybercrime and electronic

evidence
of 24/7 points of contact for cybercrime and electronic

evidence

Good practices, weaknesses, problems, possible solutions?

2. To prepare preliminary recommendations

Cybercrime@EAP II: Meeting Bucharest, 9-11 Sep 2015

Day 1 Plenary:

Results of assessment of MLA by Cybercrime Convention Committee MLA in Eastern Partnership countries
24/7 points of contact in EAP countries
International experience

• EC3/EUROPOL • Estonia
• Germany
• USA

Cybercrime@EAP II: Meeting Bucharest, 9-11 Sep 2015

Workshop sessions (background doc: replies to questionnaire):

Workshop 1: MLA

Workshop 2: 24/7

Competent authorities for MLA on cybercrime and e-evidence: set up and responsibilities

24/7 points of contact: set up and responsibilities

Types of request and offences

Types of request and offences

MLA: End-to-end procedures (case studies)

24/7 CP: End-to-end procedures (case studies)

End-to-end procedures: Problems encountered and lessons learnt

Procedures for obtaining subscriber information

End-to-end procedures: problems encountered and lessons learnt

+ Visit to DIICOT + Social dinner

Cybercrime@EAP II: Meeting Bucharest, 9-11 Sep 2015

Day 3:

  •  Project teams (country delegations) prepare preliminary recommendations
  •  Presentation and discussion of recommendations
  •  Outlook: 2nd Meeting, December 2015
  •  Cybercrime@EAP III?
  •  Conclusions

By

Robert Williams

Editor in Chief

News24.7WorldPress


Discover more from #News247WorldPress

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from #News247WorldPress

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from #News247WorldPress

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading