Robert Williams: Where we are now in science and what awaits us in the new technologies of #artificialintelligence

The science needed to solve the problems of our rapidly changing world will spring from the ideas and talents of people from many backgrounds and skill sets.

Discovery occurs when diverse perspectives come together to ask the right questions and answer them in new and innovative ways.

Research now and in the future requires deep disciplinary knowledge that is not constrained within silos.  Research of the Future – Future of Science

Carnegie Mellon University.

Professor Ross King from Cambridge’s Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, who originated the idea of a ‘Robot Scientist’, discusses why he believes

that AI-powered scientists could surpass the best human scientists by the middle of the century, but only if artificial intelligence for science is developed responsibly and ethically.

Link: https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/opinion-the-future-of-science-is-automation

Starting from the details of the above materials, science News247 proposes analysis and predictability.

The strong centers of science and research are evident in private where the state is no longer present due to the responsibility of evolution and the capitalization of the discovery in the national interest.

Perhaps the greatest momentum of science reached during the Cold War period, where the “dictators” and the “free” invested massively in research

and innovation, so that the foundation of the existence of research collapsed in more than half of the world and was only the prerogative of private property and not of the state.

Scientific journals are not available to everyone because they are very rare to take over the regular media and why? Because a small percentage of the population

knows the importance of science and innovation.

The largest percentage is faced with a fait accompli and waits with interest or surprise for the appearance of technology launches or its restrictions.

The questions are: Are scientists no longer credible and valuable enough to support science and its evolution that AI is already functional in fully automated autonomous labs?

It is sublime to see how fast they evolve and even if the appearance of other and infinite technologies is almost imperceptible, why do scientists no longer find their

place in the state’s priorities through the existence of national academies?

Is the human scientific world dividing and becoming a consumer of the discoveries offered by AI technology?

The speed of implementation of AI technology is certainly cheaper than the training in time and space of a researcher who needs a life to scientific

maturity and creation in comparison with AI in its current form.

AI, genomics, biotechnology, medicine and other fields are the new fantasy of scientists who have probably reached the peak of human intelligence to

hand over the baton to artificial intelligence for the sake of discovering its good and evil.

Questions remain unanswered: Is the academic standard lowered if the concentration around universities budgets and the provision of science?

Why is a university more important than an Academy and why can’t science be supported in the national interest and only in the private interest?

Questions and possible answers will follow in the following materials at Science News247

By

Robert Williams

Editor in Chief